Following World War II, the government acknowledged the prospect
of a strong and centralized government to unify their purpose, using power to enforce
their political regime. Although the prevalence of governmental intervention
threatens to undermine the private interface of the human existence, the mind
perpetuates its image as a sanctuary to preserve the truth. Throughout George
Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Winston
Smith endures oppression, manipulation of the truth, and propagandistic devices
employed by the Party until he decides to sacrifice his moral convictions and
concede to the cause of conformity.
Through
an abuse of power, the Party oppresses prospective revolutions, using the
impending consequence of human mortality to discourage the emergence of truth. When
astutely observing that “No one who had once fallen into the hands of the
Thought Police ever escaped in the end,” Winston observes an invasion of
privacy (Orwell 87). Highlighting the consequence of death toward any act of
defiance, the Party intimidates the public domain into an inexorable
submission. Having the sensation of “stepping into the dampness of a grave”
when agreeing to collaborate with O’Brien, Winston recognizes how launching a
revolution to challenge the Party’s omnipotence will inevitably end with his
demise (Orwell 184). Through inducing his own demise, Winston communicates how
the ability to change the world for future generations outweighs facing his own
mortality. Maintaining a shred of hope amongst the darkness, Winston demonstrates
that individuals can make a difference in the world.
Employing propaganda to promote their political organization,
the Party continues to validate their prominence over the general population. Admitting
that the “process of continuous alternation was applied not only to newspapers,
but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks,
cartoons, photographs—every kind of literature or documentation,” Winston reveals
how the Party’s ascension into power is supplemented by its censorship of the
printed word (Orwell 46-47). Of course, through manipulating the truth, the
Party is able to change the once unalterable past, discouraging any inkling of defiance.
Although Winston confesses that “his heart went out to the lonely, derided
heretic on the screen” during the Two Minutes Hate, he recognizes that Emmanuel
Goldstein, the leader of the Brotherhood, is the “sole guardian of truth and
sanity in a world of lies” (Orwell 17). By empathizing with Goldstein, Winston
identifies his true purpose in life: to use authentic evidence to deprecate the
image of the Party, initiating change.
Eventually becoming aware of the Party’s austerity,
Winston sacrifices his moral convictions in order to ease the burden on his
conscience. Foreshadowing his own imprisonment, Winston’s anticipation of
venturing “in the place where there is no darkness” misconstrues the pervasive
irony surrounding O’Brien’s words (Orwell 111). Unfortunately, the Ministry of Love’s
intentions in indoctrinating Winston are successful when exposing him to the
blinding lights, physical abuse, and interrogations. Through choosing to acknowledge
that “there was just one person to whom he could transfer his punishment,” Winston
sacrifices his moral convictions, betraying his beloved Julia in order to save
himself from facing his fear of rats (Orwell 329). Committing the ultimate act
of betrayal against the woman that he once loved, Winston accepts his futility
in changing the world, abandoning his perception of the truth and assimilating
into the culture being created by the Party.
Becoming disillusioned by the atrocities committed by the
Party, Winston immunizes himself from the darkness of the world, sacrificing
his ideal conception of the world in order to preserve his sanity. Through
surrendering the will to change the world, Winston Smith conforms to the culture
imposed by the Party. Unfortunately, he confesses that the past, present, and future
is unalterable and that the truth is predetermined by the desire of the Party.
AP Open
Question Prompt: 1977. Choose an implausible or strikingly unrealistic incident or
character in a work of fiction or drama of recognized literary merit. Write an
essay that explains how the incident or character is related to the more
realistic plausible elements in the rest of the work. Avoid plot summary.
Following World War II, Vladimir Lenin responded to the
stagnant economy of Russia
with a progressive gravitation toward socialism to preserve equality. Using an
allegory to explicate the experiences of the Bolsheviks in the Russian
Revolution, George Orwell, in Animal Farm,
acknowledges a true comprehension of the vices exploited by the human race during
their pursuit of virtue.
From humble beginnings, the pigs of Manor Farm promote an
ideal conception of the world, preaching the virtue of equality to engage a
revolution against the oppressive Mr. Jones. When commenting that “Man is the
only creature that consumes without producing,” the animals differentiate
themselves from the members of the human race, contradicting their status on
the social hierarchy of Manor Farm (Orwell 4). Developing their argument with
the exposure of the abuses endured by the animals, Old Major, representative of
Lenin, encourages the animals to launch a revolution in order to change the
outcome of the future. Of course, the promotion of an improved standard of
living is revered by the animals on Manor Farm who eventually follow in the
footsteps of their deceased leader and force the humans into exile. Incredulous
toward their apparent success in the creation of Animal Farm, the animals “could
hardly believe that it was all their own” (Orwell 15). Setting an example for
the future generations of animals, the inhabitants of Animal Farm use manual
labor to validate their ascension into power over the humans. Without the
leadership of Old Major, however, the promise of equality begins to degenerate
when the animals discover the benefits of engaging in conspicuous consumption.
Initiating changes to the Seven Commandments of Animal
Farm, the pigs use their intellect to their advantage, manipulating the animals
to work harder for monetary gain. Through manipulating the truth, the pigs thoroughly
convince the animals that the Sixth Commandment, preaching the unforgivable act
of murder against a fellow animal “had not been violated; for clearly the there
was good reason for killing the traitors” (Orwell 66). Developing an extensive vocabulary
through a comprehension of the English language, the pigs make modifications to
the Seven Commandments to validate their decisions. This alteration to the
founding principles of Animal Farm is concealed by the ignorance of the
animals, who perceive the truth to be a component of the present which “should
be reserved for the pigs alone” (Orwell 26). Expressing the successes of Manor
Farm to surrounding communities, the pigs explicitly convey their elevated
status on the social hierarchy, distinguishing themselves as capitalists in pursuit
of material commodities that are not essential to sustain life.
Convinced of their immunity to the vices of Man, the
animals acknowledge the adverse truth that the pursuit of equality is marred
with temptation. Having a revelation, the animals “looked from pig to man, and
from man to pig, and from pig to man again: but it was all ready impossible to
say which was which” (Orwell 102). Unable to achieve the ideal conception of
equality, the pigs eventually become comparable to Man when surrendering to the
opportunity of advancement. Conversing with the famers about the evident
successes of Manor Farm, the pigs demonstrate their incapacity to withhold
their moral convictions, undermining their intended purpose in creating Animal
Farm.
Contradicting the valiant purpose of the animals with
their deplorable actions, George Orwell demonstrates how imperfections corrupt
intuition when using an allegory. And, without a consideration for the future,
the animals unwittingly recreate the oppressive atmosphere of Manor Farm and accelerate
the evolution of Man into animals.
AP Open
Question Prompt: 2011. In a novel by William
Styron, a father tells his son that life “is a search for justice.” Choose a
character from a novel or play who responds in some significant way to justice
or injustice. Then write a well-developed essay in which you analyze the
character’s understanding of justice, the degree to which the character’s
search for justice is successful, and the significance of the search for the
work as a whole. Do not merely summarize the plot.
Following World War II, the rise of totalitarian
dictatorships was accentuated by an absence of economic progress. Throughout
George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four,
Winston Smith searches for the truth to preserve an ideal conception of the
world, eventually conceding to perceived injustices in order to conserve his
sanity.
Wanting the set the standard for future generations,
Winston writes in order to commence a revolution and undermine the oppressive political
organization of the Party. Acknowledging the impending consequences of his
crimes, Winston promotes how there will be “a time when truth exists and what
is done cannot be undone” (Orwell 32). And when volunteering to preserve the truth
in his diary, Winston commits the deplorable action of thoughtcrime. Thoughtcrime,
the crime of maintaining the private interface of life, is an evident death
sentence during the twentieth century. Comprehending the pertinence of preserving
the truth, Winston sacrifices his intrinsic freedoms guaranteed to all humans
when wanting “to stay alive as long as possible” to deprecate the image of the
Party (Orwell 33). Using the concept of existentialism to accentuate his
purpose, Winston demonstrates how mortality is a motive that induces pressure
and, consequently, enhances our pursuit of virtue.
Abandoning
the pursuit of truth, Winston finally acknowledges the futility plaguing his
actions. Witnessing the process of manipulating the truth and directly engaged
in the alteration of history, he comprehends how “the lie became truth” (Orwell
86). The motive of this valiant cause, to preserve a hope for future
generations, becomes concealed beneath the fear of facing mortality. Once the
Ministry of Love is revealed to be “the place without darkness,” Winston recognizes
that the Brotherhood is a fabricated myth, designed to undermine any traces of
opposition to the Party (Orwell 111). And without the encouragement of
strangers, Winston becomes increasingly dependent on his beloved, Julia, to reinvigorate
the pursuit of virtue. The extension of the invasion of privacy to personal
relationships contributes to Winston’s progressive devotion to the Party.
Without unconditional love providing protection against
the world’s sharpness, Winston sacrifices his personal integrity and moral character
to preserve his welfare. Encountering invasive interrogations and enduring inexplicable
pain, he confesses how “he felt no love for her, and he hardly ever wondered
what was happening to her” (Orwell 263). Before the intervention of the Party,
this unconditional love expressed toward his beloved, Julia, was used as an act
of defiance. Sexual intercourse, highlighting the carnal instinct of physical
attraction, prevents conformity from dictating the laws of human existence. Eventually,
the separation of lovers is concluded with betrayal when Winston comments “All
you care about is yourself” (Orwell 336). Resilience became inevitable failure.
And, without resilience, the valiance of the original cause degenerates,
allowing for the manipulated truth of the Party to become the documented truth.
With an unquestioned submission to the Party, Winston hopes to preserve his
sanity and ease the burden of the truth on his moral conscience.
Through
the removal of unconditional love, George Orwell demonstrates how the
operations of the Party are concealed from the population and encouraging
unity. This unity, implemented through the employment of propagandistic devices
and unrelenting supervision, parallels the purposes of the human existence and
maintains the imposed culture of the Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment