Monday, February 18, 2013

Poetry Essay #2 "All Is Vanity, Saieth the Preacher"

AP Poetry Essay #2: Lord Byron’s All Is Vanity, Saieth the Preacher Vanity is a deplorable but unavoidable truth of life. When given the chance, individuals will take advantage of the opportunities they are given and will descend into darkness. Although the past remains unalterable, the key to eternal salvation is to show remorse. Through demonstrating remorse, individuals can continue living while improving themselves. In All Is Vanity, Saieth the Preacher, Lord Byron employs paradoxes and personification in order to acknowledge how the vice of power consumes the human race, undermining their sacred moral principles. Delivering this oration through the perspective of a preacher, Byron demonstrates how the prevalence of temptations plagues the moral character of the individual. Epitomized as the messengers of God’s eternal words, preachers are perceived to be infallible, incapable of relenting to the temptations of the world. Exposing the concealed truth beneath this assumption, Byron recognizes how the insatiable desire of the preachers validate their deplorable standard of living, asserting how “There rose no day, there roll’d no hour/Of pleasure unembittered” (Byron 13-14). Yes, the civil obligation of the preachers is to deliver the timeless messages communicated by the Holy Bible. What happens to this valiant cause? The preacher is consumed by a pursuit of material commodities, which, consequently, prevents them from experiencing true pleasure. Although at one instance in time “Fame, wisdom, love and power” were possessions of the preacher, the temptation of accentuating their status through the acquisition of “mortal prize” clouded their judgment, leaving them to ruminate over the consequences of their actions (Byron 1, 7). Through a remembrance of their previous mistakes, the preachers initiate a repentance of their sins, modeling the virtue of forgiveness. With an unburdened conscience, preachers are able to demonstrate how achieving eternal salvation is an enviable option for the entire human race. Through personifying intrinsic qualities of the human race, Byron communicates how an indulgence in vices is an inexplicable truth of life. Constrained by the grievous mistakes endured during the past, the preacher strives to account for the days “Remembrance can discover/Which all that life or earth displays/Would lure me to live over” (Byron 10-12). Expressing a willingness to change, the preacher comes to the evident realization that the capability to change is achieved through an acceptance of your past. Although the solution to the preacher’s detraction from morality is unclear, Byron expresses how this resolution will not “list to wisdom’s lore” and will perpetuate the number of “souls that must endure it” (Byron 21, 24). An unavoidable and unfortunate truth of life, the preacher resolves to improve the content of his character to set an example for the human race. The preacher is indistinguishable from the members of the human race. The only difference is the preacher’s emotional capacity. The internal desire to change. Now, the triumph of the human spirit becomes individual perseverance against the obstacles. With a recognition of the past and an unrelenting quest for self-improvement, the preacher validates his status as a messenger of God.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with your analysis of the preacher accepting his past, allowing him to change. I think this point can be expanded with looking at other pieces of literature that relate to this topic - The Namesake. The preacher and Gogol have a similar journey to find themselves, in which they learn to accept a culture/past that they are composed of. I think the idea of this quest is universal, but the situations are always unique, which makes me want to read this book. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting how readers can see clearly from the beginning that the speaker does not still stand in a positive light. His tone and tense from the first line foreshadow his eventual falling and leave readers cautious throughout the piece as they should be when taking advantage of their opportunities in life, as you touched on. He states in the first line, “Fame, wisdom, love, and power were mine.” The contrast in the past tense but glorified terms indicates the speaker’s depression in his downfall. In the first stanza he continues to describe his past in the same way, leaving the readers anxious to discover his current fate.

    I also liked your comment on remorse stating “individuals can continue living while improving themselves,” as you can also see this from the beginning. The speaker's obvious depression with the loss of his glory days, as shown by his tense and tone, indicate this remorse and recognition right from the start. His reminiscent tone shows that he craves these previous days and shows regret for the way his life has turned out. But his recognition of this allows him to draw a deep conclusion from his happenings and allows him to reflect on it and learn from it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Animal Farm” sounds interesting due to the viewpoint of animals and their true roles within society. There has obviously been a battle on the issue of human’s identity of good vs. evil for the past…well forever really. I don’t want to get into an argument over whether humans are truly good or evil, but what your presentation made me think of what truly makes something good or evil. Through also reading “Conscience” and your essay based on that, do you think that the themes are contradictory? If there is an element of good and evil within people, why aren’t they expected to rise up out of the ashes, and redeem themselves for good if their conscious is their redeeming asset to their wrongdoing?

    Also, in your presentation, you explained how there is always potential to change. But, connecting with Paige Richie’s blog, Atwood seems to take a stab at an idea that shows that change is only short term, never long-term, enough to change complete ideas that have been rooted in the past. In her novel, the future place called Gilead uses handmaids to gain babies. This went against everything that society has worked up to until now. So, this made me wonder about the “human experience” and the various changes that are present. Is it truly possible to change not just within oneself, but through generations upon generations? Or will society forver revert back to its old habits and ideologies?

    ReplyDelete